Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary packages
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:58:49
Message-Id: 200602090956.20964.jstubbs@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary packages by Mark Loeser
1 On Thursday 09 February 2006 09:30, Mark Loeser wrote:
2 > Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> said:
3 > > It was my understanding that it is needed for the 3.3 -> 3.4 upgrade.
4 > > Various packages that will build fine against either are broken until
5 > > being recompiled after the upgrade and there is currently no way to
6 > > express this with dependencies.
7 >
8 > You need either gcc-3.3 or libstdc++-v3. I don't see forcing either upon our
9 > users to be a good thing. The upgrade doc covers how to do the 3.3->3.4
10 > upgrade, and I think most archs are on 3.4 at this point.
11
12 Ok. If the there's an upgrade doc and 3.4 postinst points to it, no problem.
13 I take it the dependencies you're asking about is for binary-only (or other?)
14 packages that specifically depend on 3.3 then?
15
16 --
17 Jason Stubbs
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary packages Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>