| 1 |
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 2 |
[snip] |
| 3 |
> Anyone who tries to argue that initramfs would be good for me to |
| 4 |
> have on my systems should brace themselves for a mouthful of foul |
| 5 |
> swedish language coming their way! ;) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I don't think anyone has argued it's "good" for anyone. An initramfs |
| 8 |
it's just now the only supported way (by udev and systemd) to have a |
| 9 |
separated /usr partition. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If your /usr is in the same partition as /, then udev and systemd |
| 12 |
supports your configuration *without* an initramfs. I have it like |
| 13 |
that in a couple of servers, and actually I only use an initramfs in |
| 14 |
my laptop and desktop because I like plymouth. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If your /usr is in a separate partition as /, and you don't want to |
| 17 |
use an initramfs, you're free to do so. Only then udev (and systemd, |
| 18 |
if you use it) will not support your configuration, and any problem |
| 19 |
you encounter will be ignored in their mailing lists/bugzillas. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 24 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 25 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives