Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: zmedico@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI Changes
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:13:59
Message-Id: 4A1029B0.3030306@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI Changes by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sat, 16 May 2009 02:31:45 +0300
3 > Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
4 >>> On the other hand you also have to make sure you have a stable
5 >>> portage for a time long enough so mostly everyone has it installed.
6 >>> Otherwise you could break users systems pretty badly depending on
7 >>> the packages. And Arch-Teams usually do a pretty good job in
8 >>> catching such cases.
9 >> How would this breakage happen? The ebuild in the vdb still has the
10 >> old EAPI.
11 >
12 > Portage likes to use metadata from the tree version of things even if
13 > there's also a version installed. This is a major nuisance, but is
14 > unfortunately considered a feature.
15 >
16
17 I think the question here is that what Portage does when there's a newer
18 EAPI in the tree version that Portage does not yet support but there's a
19 supported version in the vdb.
20
21 Regards,
22 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature