Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI Changes
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 23:33:40
Message-Id: 20090516003325.511c344f@snowmobile
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI Changes by "Petteri Räty"
1 On Sat, 16 May 2009 02:31:45 +0300
2 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On the other hand you also have to make sure you have a stable
4 > > portage for a time long enough so mostly everyone has it installed.
5 > > Otherwise you could break users systems pretty badly depending on
6 > > the packages. And Arch-Teams usually do a pretty good job in
7 > > catching such cases.
8 >
9 > How would this breakage happen? The ebuild in the vdb still has the
10 > old EAPI.
11
12 Portage likes to use metadata from the tree version of things even if
13 there's also a version installed. This is a major nuisance, but is
14 unfortunately considered a feature.
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI Changes "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>