1 |
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> I would like to ask about adding "systemd" USE flag to use.stable.mask |
3 |
> to let us stop needing to revbump packages with optional systemd support |
4 |
> when stabilizing them. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Are you ok with that? |
7 |
|
8 |
Am I interpreting the impacts of this correctly? I believe this would |
9 |
mean that if you ran systemd on an otherwise-stable system (that is, |
10 |
only systemd and possibly udev are in package.keywords) then you won't |
11 |
get systemd support in any of your other packages, even if it is |
12 |
available in a stable version of that package? My only VM running |
13 |
systemd just happens to be in that configuration, but I'm willing to |
14 |
admit that I'm a bit of an edge case. :) |
15 |
|
16 |
Why exactly do we need to revbump packages with optional systemd |
17 |
support when stabilizing them in the first place? ~arch users would |
18 |
already have systemd support compiled if they use it, and stable users |
19 |
would get it when it is stabilized. |
20 |
|
21 |
I freely admit that there might be some nuance that I'm simply not |
22 |
getting here... |
23 |
|
24 |
Rich |