1 |
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:35:27 -0500 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > I would like to ask about adding "systemd" USE flag to use.stable.mask |
6 |
> > to let us stop needing to revbump packages with optional systemd support |
7 |
> > when stabilizing them. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Are you ok with that? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Am I interpreting the impacts of this correctly? I believe this would |
12 |
> mean that if you ran systemd on an otherwise-stable system (that is, |
13 |
> only systemd and possibly udev are in package.keywords) then you won't |
14 |
> get systemd support in any of your other packages, even if it is |
15 |
> available in a stable version of that package? My only VM running |
16 |
> systemd just happens to be in that configuration, but I'm willing to |
17 |
> admit that I'm a bit of an edge case. :) |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Why exactly do we need to revbump packages with optional systemd |
20 |
> support when stabilizing them in the first place? ~arch users would |
21 |
> already have systemd support compiled if they use it, and stable users |
22 |
> would get it when it is stabilized. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I freely admit that there might be some nuance that I'm simply not |
25 |
> getting here... |
26 |
|
27 |
You have to stable-unmask it in your /etc/portage/profile: |
28 |
|
29 |
use.stable.mask: |
30 |
|
31 |
-systemd |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Best regards, |
35 |
Michał Górny |