| 1 |
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 4:38 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> i maintain them ... and if you look at the date on the d ebuild you'll find |
| 3 |
> it was in portage a few hours after d was released ;) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
d's an experimental patch. Why is it the only version in portage? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> as for adding back in older versions, ill look into it ... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Seems a shame to have an ebuild only for a version that is well-known as |
| 10 |
broken ... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Especially as your ebuild for NS-2 installs the 3.1.1.0c version of NS, and |
| 13 |
(unless I've missed it in the ebuild) doesn't include the patch to make NS-2 |
| 14 |
run on 3.1.1.1d. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> i'm still trying to make hlds work properly on 1.0/1.2/1.4 boxes ... glibc |
| 17 |
> seems to cause issues of course :/ |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
libs-compat fixes that for me just fine, at least with 3.1.1.0c + boffix. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I also noticed that Metamod is built from source. HLDS (which is a C++ |
| 22 |
program) is very sensitive to which version of GCC is used to build Metamod |
| 23 |
(and Metamods), and most people find it seg faults most of the time when |
| 24 |
compiled from source. It might be worth adding an ebuild for the binary |
| 25 |
release of Metamod - or talk to Will Day (metamod's author) to discuss which |
| 26 |
GCC & CXXFLAGS are likely to bring the most success. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I'd also be very interested in seeing HLDS support the +vhosts scheme we've |
| 29 |
been discussing about webapps. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Best regards, |
| 32 |
Stu |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
| 35 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 36 |
Beta packages for download http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/packages/ |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
| 39 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
| 40 |
-- |
Archives