| 1 |
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 05:50, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 06 August 2003 4:38 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > i maintain them ... and if you look at the date on the d ebuild you'll |
| 4 |
> > find it was in portage a few hours after d was released ;) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> d's an experimental patch. Why is it the only version in portage? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
ive been outta the hlds loop for almost a year now ... hopefully ill be able |
| 9 |
to get my ns server up again in a few weeks :) |
| 10 |
i only ever had the 3.1.1.1 ebuilds in portage because i saw they fixed |
| 11 |
exploits ... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > as for adding back in older versions, ill look into it ... |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Seems a shame to have an ebuild only for a version that is well-known as |
| 16 |
> broken ... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
yep, 3.1.1.0, 3.1.1.1, and 3.1.1.1d are now in portage |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Especially as your ebuild for NS-2 installs the 3.1.1.0c version of NS, and |
| 21 |
> (unless I've missed it in the ebuild) doesn't include the patch to make |
| 22 |
> NS-2 run on 3.1.1.1d. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
URL for said patch ? :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> > i'm still trying to make hlds work properly on 1.0/1.2/1.4 boxes ... |
| 27 |
> > glibc seems to cause issues of course :/ |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> libs-compat fixes that for me just fine, at least with 3.1.1.0c + boffix. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
URL for boffix ? ;) |
| 32 |
and did you mean 3.1.1.0 ? or 3.1.1.1c ? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> I also noticed that Metamod is built from source. HLDS (which is a C++ |
| 35 |
> program) is very sensitive to which version of GCC is used to build Metamod |
| 36 |
> (and Metamods), and most people find it seg faults most of the time when |
| 37 |
> compiled from source. It might be worth adding an ebuild for the binary |
| 38 |
> release of Metamod - or talk to Will Day (metamod's author) to discuss |
| 39 |
> which GCC & CXXFLAGS are likely to bring the most success. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
yeah, i added 1.16.2 today which defaults to binary install unless user has |
| 42 |
USE=src ... oddly it worked for me just fine ... or i could just be smokin |
| 43 |
crack ... |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
> I'd also be very interested in seeing HLDS support the +vhosts scheme we've |
| 46 |
> been discussing about webapps. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
i havent been following webapps so i have no idea what you're refering to ... |
| 49 |
but my first thought is 'what the hell does webapps/vhosts have to do with |
| 50 |
hlds ?' ... only relation that pops into my head is hlstat support ... |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-mike |
Archives