Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	[gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords
Date:	Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:20:39
Message-Id:	`dm85tu$s55$1@sea.gmane.org`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords by Andrej Kacian

1	Andrej Kacian wrote:
2	> On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:39:43 -0600
3	> R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> wrote:
4	>
5	>>> * if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc.
6	>> Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail
7	>> under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of the packages
8	>> in this list so I'm interested in knowing what's worth fixing and what's
9	>> being pedantic.
10	>
11	> Note that some of the packages caught by this test also install non-generic
12	> (thus actually useful) INSTALL document.
13
14	Yep, i did notice that. Most of them on this list are, but i'm still weeding
15	through them.
16
17	--de.
18
19	--
20	gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list