Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devleopment sources are no longer 'development' - example
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:34:11
Message-Id: ea440b1d04082511344643961c@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] devleopment sources are no longer 'development' - example by Greg KH
1 Let me suggest the following:
2
3 rename all kernels to have their version concatenated, that is:
4
5 gentoo-sources24
6 gentoo-sources26
7
8 Instead of having no numbering, do the opposite, have them all
9 numbered. This way there will be no more problems with kernel
10 versioning again.
11
12
13 On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:22:58 -0700, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote:
14 >
15 >
16 > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 02:03:51PM -0400, Travis Tilley wrote:
17 > > here's an example of how his creates confusion, where on amd64 our
18 > > stable kernel is named development-sources.
19 >
20 > I agree it's a pain. Hopefully this can be fixed someday soon with
21 > slots.
22 >
23 > thanks,
24 >
25 > greg k-h
26 >
27 >
28 >
29 > --
30 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
31 >
32 >
33
34
35 --
36 Ioannis Aslanidis
37 <aioannis[at]tinet[dot]org>
38 <dwcommander[at]users[dot]sourceforge[dot]net>
39
40 Hellenic Gentoo GNU/Linux project manager (http://hellenicgentoo.sf.net)
41 FIRECOPS++ project manager (http://firecops.sf.net)
42
43 Computer Engineering student at Universitat Rovira i Virgili
44
45 --
46 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies