| 1 |
on 08/25/04 14:34 Ioannis Aslanidis said the following: |
| 2 |
> Let me suggest the following: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> rename all kernels to have their version concatenated, that is: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> gentoo-sources24 |
| 7 |
> gentoo-sources26 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Instead of having no numbering, do the opposite, have them all |
| 10 |
> numbered. This way there will be no more problems with kernel |
| 11 |
> versioning again. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This is what makes sense to me. What happens when 2.7 comes around? 2.4 and |
| 15 |
2.6 are both stable kernels. Whether or not version numbers are used though, |
| 16 |
*SOMETHING* has to be done. The 2.6 kernel is the latest stable kernel, and |
| 17 |
there's nothing "development" about it. This is just confusing for users, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Wcc |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives