| 1 |
W dniu nie, 03.12.2017 o godzinie 21∶30 +0100, użytkownik Dirkjan |
| 2 |
Ochtman napisał: |
| 3 |
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > 1. Posting to gentoo-dev@ and gentoo-project@ mailing lists will be |
| 6 |
> > initially restricted to active Gentoo developers. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > 1a. Subscription (reading) and archives will still be open. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > 1b. Active Gentoo contributors will be able to obtain posting access |
| 11 |
> > upon being vouched for by an active Gentoo developer. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> On the face of it, I like this proposal. On the other hand, wouldn't it be |
| 15 |
> better if we just had more active list moderators? That is, moderators who |
| 16 |
> move problematic user's posts to moderated by default, and then withhold |
| 17 |
> the specific posts if necessary? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I don't think this is really technically feasible. I don't know if mlmmj |
| 20 |
has the specific feature you're asking for, and even if it did, |
| 21 |
moderation with mlmmj is practically impossible to use. Even for low- |
| 22 |
traffic channel like gentoo-dev-announce@ it's not working well. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> 2. A new mailing list 'gentoo-expert' will be formed to provide |
| 26 |
> > a discussion medium for expert Gentoo users and developers. |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > 2a. gentoo-expert will have open posting access like gentoo-dev has now. |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> I'm not sure this will be worth it. Who exactly do you think is the |
| 32 |
> audience for this mailing list? What is the goal? How is it different from |
| 33 |
> existing mailing lists? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
The audience is expect users who usually don't need basic support |
| 36 |
but instead want to discuss the development of Gentoo and want to have |
| 37 |
some impact on where it goes. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
The main goal is to be able to restore more developers to gentoo-dev@, |
| 40 |
and be able to focus it on feedback and reviews. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
In other words, the goal is that if the attitude on gentoo-expert |
| 43 |
becomes impossible to bear, the developers can unsubscribe from that |
| 44 |
list without actually losing the ability to give feedback on important |
| 45 |
Gentoo issues. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> Cheers, |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> Dirkjan |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-- |
| 53 |
Best regards, |
| 54 |
Michał Górny |
Archives