| 1 |
Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013, 10:05:54 schrieb Duncan: |
| 2 |
> Thus definitely ++. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> The one big concern I have is that in our approach to the srcd folks we |
| 5 |
> make clear we're *NOT* attempting to take over their project. That's the |
| 6 |
> sensitivity I see with the co-branded idea. I'd actually prefer that we |
| 7 |
> NOT do a co-branded thing, unless the srcd folks suggest it (this assumes |
| 8 |
> yngwin's not srcd upstream and thus did indeed just make that offer, I |
| 9 |
> don't know), and simply cooperate a bit more with them, filing bugs (and |
| 10 |
> as their upstream fixing them in gentoo where possible), helping to fix |
| 11 |
> the ppp networking config issues already mentioned, etc, while simply |
| 12 |
> using their releases as they are. If we want to point out that they're a |
| 13 |
> gentoo-based project that we happily endorse in our handbook links to |
| 14 |
> them, great, but I'm afraid a co-branded suggestion from our side might |
| 15 |
> come across as an attempt to take over, and that'd benefit absolutely no |
| 16 |
> one! |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
+1 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
They are doing a great job, and we should acknowledge that, talk to them but |
| 21 |
not interfere. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
First of all this is a decision of our own policy. (Do we want to officially |
| 24 |
recommend a third-party tool in our documentation?) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 30 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 31 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives