| 1 |
How about we just leave them as local use flags and move on? global |
| 2 |
vs. local is more then just about number of packages using the flag. |
| 3 |
It has more to do with, "Is this flag globally useful and relevant." |
| 4 |
So far, I haven't seen a recently suggest local use flag that cries out |
| 5 |
to be made global. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Michael Sterrett |
| 8 |
-Mr. Bones.- |
| 9 |
mr_bones_@g.o |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Am Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2007 18:25 schrieb Timothy Redaelli: |
| 15 |
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 16 |
>>> On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:32:56 +0100 Timothy Redaelli |
| 17 |
>>> <drizzt@g.o> |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> wrote: |
| 20 |
>>> | What do you think about custom-cflags global USE? |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> I think it encourages policy violations. |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/user-environment/index |
| 25 |
>>> .html |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> I know the policy, but sometimes upstream does not want user CFLAGS, |
| 28 |
>> zsnes developers will remove support for Gentoo hosts from their bug |
| 29 |
>> reports if i remove custom-cflags use and also mplayer. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> What about making custom-cflags default in the base profile? |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Danny |
| 34 |
> -- |
| 35 |
> Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| 36 |
> Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project |
| 37 |
> -- |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives