1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 19:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> Why not put a <maintainernotes> in metadata.xml instead? Much cleaner, |
6 |
> provides much more information, doesn't imply meaning in an existing |
7 |
> field which does not currently provide any information. |
8 |
|
9 |
If we maybe later would like to implement the possibility that users can |
10 |
decide only to use package maintainer approved packages, portage would have |
11 |
to parse metadata.xml, too. I thought metadata.xml is more suited for less |
12 |
variable data!? |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Carsten |
16 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
17 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
18 |
|
19 |
iD8DBQFA2LCJVwbzmvGLSW8RAhZ4AJoD+PIUzTK+NQhG1hoNm34oOPtiHACdEMmw |
20 |
kFRfxlspABwTbg4cHFoVANk= |
21 |
=8fQW |
22 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |