| 1 |
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:46:42 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Yes, both concepts have problems. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The problems are of a different kind. Static dependencies don't do |
| 6 |
something that you want them to do. Dynamic dependencies are outright |
| 7 |
broken. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Since neither solution is perfect, why choose the one |
| 10 |
> with unnecessary rebuilds? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
We are picking the *correct* solution, not the one that sometimes hides |
| 13 |
an occasional inconvenience (but unreliably) at the expense of being |
| 14 |
utterly broken. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives