Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:47:13
Message-Id: slrnlt7fqg.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
2 >> But, OK, so I will use your strawman to prove
3 >> how static deps are broken:
4 >
5 > This is not broken. This is exactly what is supposed to happen
6
7 "It's not a bug it's a feature"
8 Of course, one can always close the eyes when faced
9 with problems.
10
11 > and it
12 > is exactly what *does* happen some of the time with dynamic
13 > dependencies too.
14
15 Yes, both concepts have problems.
16 Since neither solution is perfect, why choose the one
17 with unnecessary rebuilds?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>