| 1 |
On 31/03/2008, Patrick Lauer <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Anders Ossowicki wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On 31/03/2008, *Thilo Bangert* <bangert@g.o |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > <mailto:bangert@g.o>> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > > Please think things through before asking to have pkgcore's bugs |
| 9 |
> > > 'fixed' via specification next time... |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > maybe my english language skills or social interaction qualities are |
| 12 |
> > failing me, but i find the above sentence highly offensive. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > pkgcore crashes on ebuilds with explicit -r0 in the PV, which led to |
| 16 |
> > Brian Harring bringing this entire discussion up in the first place. |
| 17 |
> > Rather than getting pkgcore to handle -r0 correctly, he decided to try |
| 18 |
> > and get it banned through the specification. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> That bug has been adressed, still leaves the underlying problem wether |
| 21 |
> to allow this ambiguity or not. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Excellent - now that light has been shed on this minor detail, I'm sure you |
| 25 |
won't see that comment on pkgcore bugs again. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If you have the patience to read the |
| 28 |
> pingpong between Harring and McCreesh the current discussion is wether |
| 29 |
> that format even makes sense, not wether a fixed bug in a third-party |
| 30 |
> app is relevant. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I'm pretty sure the aforementioned pingpong started as a result of a pkgcore |
| 34 |
bug. Thilo referred to one of Ciaran's first replies and as such, I see no |
| 35 |
reason to regard that reply as an ad hominem attack. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Enough, I was only replying to a question brought up by Thilo, and I do not |
| 38 |
want to waste time on an endless discussion with other gentoo users. |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Anders Ossowicki <and@×××.dk> |
Archives