| 1 |
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 03:05 am, Stuart Longland wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jan Kundrát wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Stuart Longland wrote: |
| 4 |
> >>Anyway, wouldn't security updates include the core system, rather than |
| 5 |
> >>just things like Apache? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Security updates are updates which are fixing *security* problems. |
| 8 |
> > Upgrading glibc is not a security update, IMHO :-). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Yep... 100% agree... but {g,µC,diet,bsd,whatever}libc is not immune to |
| 11 |
> security issues. :-) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
and to prove the point we have a few GLSA's for glibc |
| 14 |
-mike |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives