| 1 |
On Wed, 28 May 2003 05:20:44 -0400 |
| 2 |
Kumba <kumba@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Eitherway, yeah, net-www/mozilla-firebird sounds pretty good. bit |
| 5 |
> lengthy, but it's not the only one. I've a feeling we'ed need a |
| 6 |
> net-mail/mozilla-thunderbird in the future as well, just to keep |
| 7 |
> consistency. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
"4. Use the names "Mozilla Browser" and "Mozilla Mail" to describe the |
| 10 |
Firebird and Thunderbird projects after the 1.4 release." [1] |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
How about using this names (mozilla-browser, mozilla-mail)? This would |
| 13 |
also spare us the trouble of renaming everything again after 1.4 is |
| 14 |
released. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
And to keep consistent with the above, the current Mozilla ebuild could |
| 17 |
be renamed to mozilla-application-suite (or mozilla-suite): |
| 18 |
"1. When referring to a SeaMonkey-based release use the phrase "Mozilla |
| 19 |
Application Suite" as the name of the app suite." [1] |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Just my 2 cents, |
| 22 |
Michael |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[1] http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap/branding.html)+ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
www.cargal.org |
| 29 |
GnuPG-key-ID: 0x90CA09E3 |
| 30 |
Jabber-ID: citizen428 [at] cargal [dot] org |
| 31 |
Registered Linux User #278726 |
Archives