| 1 |
On 01/14/2014 09:09 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> After the package has been sitting in ~arch for 90 days with an open |
| 4 |
> stable request with no blockers that the arch team has not taken any |
| 5 |
> action on. We are not talking about randomly yanking package versions, |
| 6 |
> just doing something when arch teams are not responsive, and it seems |
| 7 |
> that the cleanest thing to do would be to remove the old versions. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
People running stable value... stability. I would much rather wait for |
| 11 |
the arch teams to get un-busy than to be forced to upgrade to something |
| 12 |
untested. Why would I care if it takes another month? Strictly from a |
| 13 |
user's perspective. I don't, unless I do, in which case I know that I |
| 14 |
do, and I could just keyword the thing if I wanted to. |
Archives