Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aadi Deshpande <cilqproj@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] LibPNG Problems :(
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:07:02
Message-Id: 20020418020700.14819.qmail@web20309.mail.yahoo.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] LibPNG Problems :( by Milos Negovanovic
1 Not only did the png upgrade work for me ( very well after my initial scare, thanks Spider ), but it was your option to upgrade the png libs.
2 I picked Gentoo because it let's me stay on the bleeding edge, and there are consequences that you pay for at the bleeding edge, consequences that I'm willing to live with, but apparently you are not.
3 There are rationales for why this was required and I think Spider expressed them well. No one wants to waste anyone's time, but that is a side effect of libpng not of Gentoo or it's maintainers.
4 You may have opinions about the state of open-source and free software, but I hope they're not based solely on this one experience and strictly in a Windows vs. Linux mentality. Every OS experiences some level of DLL hell and Windows has more of it's own fair share. I look only to the sad IDE that VS6.0 was to think back to my own experiences.
5 Frankly, I don't understand why anyone would pick Gentoo if they're not willing to put the effort forth. You want a fairly optimized, well maintained system that doesn't let you get into trouble, pick Mandrake, pick Debian, pick any of the binary only distributions.
6 Not to mention that they're all much more mature than Gentoo, having been through many revisions apiece. Remember, <b>you</b> wanted in on the ground floor.
7 Sorry, enough ranting.
8
9
10 Milos Negovanovic <milosn@××××××××××××.nz> wrote:
11 On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 22:08:10 +0000
12 "Eugenia Loli-Queru" wrote:
13
14 > Sorry, this solution is NOT acceptable. This pretty much says that I
15 > have rebuild most of my graphics apps, and possibly X (which I
16 > recompiled it just yesterday anyway during my upgrade to 1.1a). This
17 > is just WAY too time consuming, and, simply put, it doesn't worth the
18 > trouble. I would expect Gentoo LLC to find a better solutions for its
19 > users, especially if this error was not a user error, but the
20 > maintener's. Asking poor cpu cycle users to recompile everything, it
21 > is just not so good, don't you think?
22 >
23 > WHY this "dll hell" had happened anyway? Is there not another, easier
24 > way to fix this, by downloading a new libpng or something else? It
25 > seems that _a lot_ of people just got on the same problem, if I judge
26 > from the number of emails regarding the new libpng problems that
27 > breaks compatibility.
28 >
29 > So, who's problem that is? The person who did the ebuilds? the person
30 > who did other depended ebuilds? libpng's? Mine for want to run Linux
31 > and in fact ran into dll hell? :(
32 >
33 > /me goes back to Windows, MacOSX and BeOS. The Free/Open software is
34 > not there yet for the end user (forget the fact that I am actually a
35 > developer - Linux is only free if you have a lot of free time to spare
36 > - I don't).
37 >
38 > Thank you all for the answers so far, in the last 2 weeks. I really
39 > appreciated your help. Please do not see the above as whining, these
40 > are just my honest thoughts about the free software as a whole today
41 > (I mean, when you put all these individual projects to work together
42 > under the umbrella of an OS - any OS). Not very well co-ordinated. :(
43 >
44 > Regards,
45 > Eugenia
46 >
47 >
48 > >Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] LibPNG Problems :(
49 > >From: Matthew Kennedy
50 > >To: gentoo-dev@g.o
51 > >Date: 17 Apr 2002 03:04:43 -0500
52 > >Reply-To: gentoo-dev@g.o
53 > >
54 > >Howdy,
55 > >
56 > >On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 02:20, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
57 > > > http://www.eugenia.co.uk/snapshot1.png
58 > > > You are seeing Konqueror with no icons, the actual error messages
59 > > > on the right hand side, and also my libpngs on the terminal above,
60 > > > as they live on
61 > > > /usr/lib.
62 > >
63 > >This problem and it's solution was discussed a few times on the
64 > >gentoo-user list a while back. Hope the URLs to them help.
65 > >
66 > >http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-user/2002-April/019211.html
67 > >http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-user/2002-April/020543.html
68 > >http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-user/2002-April/020182.html
69 > >
70 > >Matt
71 > >
72 > >--
73 > >Matthew Kennedy
74 > >Gentoo Linux Developer
75 >
76 >
77 > _________________________________________________________________
78 > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
79 > http://www.hotmail.com
80 >
81 > _______________________________________________
82 > gentoo-dev mailing list
83 > gentoo-dev@g.o
84 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
85 >
86 Hello,
87
88 i must say that instructions for updating libpng worked smoothly (for me
89 that is). Also majority of complaints posted here come from KDE people
90 and are related to simple fact that they have to recompile bigger part
91 fo their systems and that they dont like it ( hehe i wouldnt either :)
92 ).
93
94 Milos
95 (i am not gentoo developer, just casual visitor)
96 _______________________________________________
97 gentoo-dev mailing list
98 gentoo-dev@g.o
99 http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107 ---------------------------------
108 Do You Yahoo!?
109 Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax