| 1 |
On Saturday 08 of October 2005 03:21 Dan Meltzer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Okay, so that worked, but then I got to thinking, why not do these |
| 3 |
> fairly regularly? I do not profess to know enough to hold them about |
| 4 |
> a large amount of topics, but I think this could surely supplant the |
| 5 |
> current documentation process. Here is basic rundown and example. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Hm, I don't like that. What's wrong with writing normal documentation and |
| 8 |
giving links to the users? IMHO it has a lot of advantages - it can be |
| 9 |
translated (and it is, in most cases), easily updated and is available for a |
| 10 |
wider range of users (I wouldn't read IRC log of 30 minutes lecture, but I'd |
| 11 |
read the doc). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Of course feel free to make a class before making "real doc", but IMHO it |
| 14 |
won't help the GDP people if you just give them IRC log. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Cheers, |
| 17 |
-jkt |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives