| 1 |
On 27/10/16 09:23 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote: |
| 2 |
> Out of curiosity, why do folks say that the use of LABEL=<name> is not |
| 3 |
> good? I realize that <name>s are not required when doing a mkfs, but |
| 4 |
> if the admin does so reliably and wants to use LABEL= thereafter, why should |
| 5 |
> it be "deprecated"? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I don't think anyone said that the LABEL= syntax is bad; quite the |
| 8 |
opposite -- WilliamH wants everyone using /dev/disk/by-label/<name> |
| 9 |
paths in fstab to instead use LABEL=<name> , to avoid issues if udev |
| 10 |
doesn't create the symlinks before localmount tries to use them. |
Archives