From: | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others | ||
Date: | Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:45:00 | ||
Message-Id: | 50ED580C.4080102@flameeyes.eu | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others by justin |
1 | On 09/01/2013 12:39, justin wrote: |
2 | > I assume it is a portage problem, because the log says autoconf is run |
3 | > but configure.in didn't change. |
4 | > |
5 | |
6 | What do you mean configure.in didn't change but autoconf is run? |
7 | |
8 | Does it cause a maintainer-mode rebuild? |
9 | |
10 | Did you use eautoreconf? |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
14 | flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others | justin <jlec@g.o> |