1 |
On 09/01/13 12:29, justin wrote: |
2 |
> On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
3 |
>> On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the |
6 |
>>> difference in configure). This leads to disrespected LDFLAGS and broken |
7 |
>>> tclConfig.sh. So this simple change has deep consequences. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> This looks like the _version_ of autoconf used is different. Is the |
10 |
>> output from the same exact system? |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Okay, did some more debugging and it seems to be not the new singly |
14 |
> inheriting eclass. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Repeating the sequential emerge on different FS I get a completely mixed |
17 |
> result. Sometimes both compile are good, sometimes only one and sometime |
18 |
> none. |
19 |
> Could this be a problem with eautoreconf or is this autotools specifc |
20 |
> problem? |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
I assume it is a portage problem, because the log says autoconf is run |
24 |
but configure.in didn't change. |