Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: justin <jlec@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:30:30
Message-Id: 50ED54A3.8040400@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
2 > On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote:
3 >>
4 >> Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the
5 >> difference in configure). This leads to disrespected LDFLAGS and broken
6 >> tclConfig.sh. So this simple change has deep consequences.
7 >
8 > This looks like the _version_ of autoconf used is different. Is the
9 > output from the same exact system?
10 >
11
12 Okay, did some more debugging and it seems to be not the new singly
13 inheriting eclass.
14
15 Repeating the sequential emerge on different FS I get a completely mixed
16 result. Sometimes both compile are good, sometimes only one and sometime
17 none.
18 Could this be a problem with eautoreconf or is this autotools specifc
19 problem?
20
21 justin

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies