Archives
Archives
| From: | John Nilsson <john@×××××××.nu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: GLEP 26 -- Handling kernels with portage | ||
| Date: | Thu, 06 May 2004 12:20:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1083846132.22986.3.camel@newkid.milsson.nu | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: GLEP 26 -- Handling kernels with portage by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 13:31, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | > The fact that the kernel remains an exception to the normal build |
| 3 | > process is a GOOD thing, IMO. It accentuates its uniqueness and extreme |
| 4 | > customizability (think the impossible to support with use flags thing), |
| 5 | > and the fact that without it, you are dead-in-the-water. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I might add that to incorporate the kernel fully into the portage system |
| 8 | one would have to make ebuilds for each module. That is just more work |
| 9 | than it's worth. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -John |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |