Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The request to abolish games team policy
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 23:34:56
Message-Id: 53BF230D.8090508@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The request to abolish games team policy by Samuli Suominen
1 Samuli Suominen:
2 >
3 > On 09/07/14 18:35, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
4 >> В письме от Вт, 8 июля 2014 18:22:50 пользователь Samuli Suominen написал:
5 >>> It seems to me like people aren't making the effort of joining to the
6 >>> team and meeting the high quality
7 >>> ebuild syntax they've kept up...
8 >> Samuli! With all my respect to you personally, please, don't tell anything
9 >> about "high quality" of ebuilds syntax by the games team. Please.
10 >>
11 >
12 > There are open bugs (non-ebuild bugs), sure
13 > There are sometimes wrong dependencies in old binary-only games which
14 > require special CD-ROM or other distfile, because that's
15 > when we rely upon users to report the dependencies
16 >
17 > But, the ebuild syntax is good as it's in eg. base-system, toolchain
18 > And games ebuilds are nice examples for people learning to write ebuilds
19 >
20 > So, don't know what you are referring to...
21 >
22 > - Samuli
23 >
24
25 boooooooooo
26
27 I dont see any cocin brooooo let us do a dancee ::Dd
28
29
30 damce damve dance