| 1 |
On 09/07/14 18:35, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: |
| 2 |
> В письме от Вт, 8 июля 2014 18:22:50 пользователь Samuli Suominen написал: |
| 3 |
>> It seems to me like people aren't making the effort of joining to the |
| 4 |
>> team and meeting the high quality |
| 5 |
>> ebuild syntax they've kept up... |
| 6 |
> Samuli! With all my respect to you personally, please, don't tell anything |
| 7 |
> about "high quality" of ebuilds syntax by the games team. Please. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
There are open bugs (non-ebuild bugs), sure |
| 11 |
There are sometimes wrong dependencies in old binary-only games which |
| 12 |
require special CD-ROM or other distfile, because that's |
| 13 |
when we rely upon users to report the dependencies |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
But, the ebuild syntax is good as it's in eg. base-system, toolchain |
| 16 |
And games ebuilds are nice examples for people learning to write ebuilds |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
So, don't know what you are referring to... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- Samuli |
Archives