| 1 |
Samuli Suominen: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 09/07/14 18:35, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: |
| 4 |
>> В письме от Вт, 8 июля 2014 18:22:50 пользователь Samuli Suominen написал: |
| 5 |
>>> It seems to me like people aren't making the effort of joining to the |
| 6 |
>>> team and meeting the high quality |
| 7 |
>>> ebuild syntax they've kept up... |
| 8 |
>> Samuli! With all my respect to you personally, please, don't tell anything |
| 9 |
>> about "high quality" of ebuilds syntax by the games team. Please. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> There are open bugs (non-ebuild bugs), sure |
| 13 |
> There are sometimes wrong dependencies in old binary-only games which |
| 14 |
> require special CD-ROM or other distfile, because that's |
| 15 |
> when we rely upon users to report the dependencies |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> But, the ebuild syntax is good as it's in eg. base-system, toolchain |
| 18 |
> And games ebuilds are nice examples for people learning to write ebuilds |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> So, don't know what you are referring to... |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> - Samuli |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I think my mail client is broken, so the previous mail had some |
| 26 |
unrelated strings. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Anyway, I agree that there is a high standard and it might be harder for |
| 29 |
inexperienced contributors to get their first games ebuilds in shape, |
| 30 |
but it is doable. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
However, basically having only a single person that actively does such |
| 33 |
reviews + no official overlay makes it hard for contributors. |
Archives