1 |
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:24 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> However, basically having only a single person that actively does such |
4 |
> reviews + no official overlay makes it hard for contributors. |
5 |
> |
6 |
|
7 |
Is there still anybody left who wants to actually join the games team? |
8 |
I suggested that somebody step up who was interested in a previous |
9 |
email and did not get any takers. There isn't much point in trying to |
10 |
break the logjam of people joining if nobody wants to join. |
11 |
|
12 |
I don't have a personal interest in joining the team, but if there are |
13 |
people around who want to join the team but don't want to deal with |
14 |
trying to get the team re-organized I don't mind just helping to kick |
15 |
things off. That said, somebody will have to be the lead (and it |
16 |
could be the same as the current lead if the team so decides). |
17 |
|
18 |
So, if you are just shy about posting publicly feel free to email me |
19 |
with your interest in joining the games project and I'll see if I can |
20 |
help mediate a little. |
21 |
|
22 |
Again, this is just personal initiative and my main interest is trying |
23 |
to constitute a games project that runs itself and doesn't need order |
24 |
imposed from above. If I run into strong objections/etc I'll turn it |
25 |
over to the next Council to deal with whether that includes me or not. |
26 |
In the absence of objection, however (and nobody has raised any yet), |
27 |
I don't see any reason that we can't try to add more members to the |
28 |
team. |
29 |
|
30 |
Rich |