1 |
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 9:44:41 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| On 5/9/2005 1:29:57, Ciaran McCreesh (ciaranm@g.o) wrote: |
4 |
| > On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 1:12:54 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" |
5 |
| > <kevquinn@g.o> |
6 |
| > wrote: |
7 |
| > | 3) All packages need to be assigned an x86 arch team member |
8 |
| > | responsible. |
9 |
| > |
10 |
| > Why? |
11 |
| |
12 |
| Because if only the x86 arch team can mark stuff stable, anything |
13 |
| without representation on the x86 arch team will stay unstable |
14 |
| forever. Maybe rather than one specific arch team member, several |
15 |
| would undertake to manage otherwise unassigned packages. |
16 |
|
17 |
There are currently ~700 packages which are not visible to x86 or ~x86 |
18 |
users. Do these need an x86 arch team member? Is it the aim of the x86 |
19 |
arch team to cover the entire tree, or only things which are useful to |
20 |
x86 users? |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
24 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
25 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |