Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 16:08:48
Message-Id: 20050905170257.77400810@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep by "Kevin F. Quinn"
1 On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 9:44:41 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | On 5/9/2005 1:29:57, Ciaran McCreesh (ciaranm@g.o) wrote:
4 | > On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 1:12:54 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn"
5 | > <kevquinn@g.o>
6 | > wrote:
7 | > | 3) All packages need to be assigned an x86 arch team member
8 | > | responsible.
9 | >
10 | > Why?
11 |
12 | Because if only the x86 arch team can mark stuff stable, anything
13 | without representation on the x86 arch team will stay unstable
14 | forever. Maybe rather than one specific arch team member, several
15 | would undertake to manage otherwise unassigned packages.
16
17 There are currently ~700 packages which are not visible to x86 or ~x86
18 users. Do these need an x86 arch team member? Is it the aim of the x86
19 arch team to cover the entire tree, or only things which are useful to
20 x86 users?
21
22 --
23 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
24 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
25 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Stuart Longland <redhatter@g.o>