From: | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=threads vs. USE=threadsafe | ||
Date: | Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:37:45 | ||
Message-Id: | 20080602213740.653010a8@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] USE=threads vs. USE=threadsafe by Christian Hoffmann |
1 | On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:25:29 +0200 |
2 | Christian Hoffmann <hoffie@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > I think we should be consistent here |
5 | |
6 | You may also want to consider the following: |
7 | threadsonly [dev-libs/boost] |
8 | ithreads [sys-devel/libperl] |
9 | orathreads [dev-libs/libsqlora8] |
10 | frnothreads [net-dialup/freeradius] |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | Kind regards, |
14 | JeR |
15 | -- |
16 | gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=threads vs. USE=threadsafe | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: USE=threads vs. USE=threadsafe | "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@g.o> |