Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:01:46
Message-Id: 45DBB568.5020603@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) by Brian Harring
1 Brian Harring wrote:
2 [snip]
3 > In light of that, don't really see any reason for the council to *not*
4 > get a status update on it.
5
6 We get "status" updates on it. it's pretty much "it's not done, we
7 don't want to show you" every month. It's one of the things I intend to
8 bring up at the march meeting.
9
10 [snip]
11
12 --
13 =======================================================
14 Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org
15 Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead
16 Gentoo Council
17 Gentoo Developer Relations
18 Gentoo Infrastructure
19 GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05
20 =======================================================
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>