1 |
Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013, 10:39:58 schrieb Rich Freeman: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> What's the point? I don't think democracy is the best way to handle |
4 |
> these sorts of things. |
5 |
|
6 |
LOL. Yeah, but haven't we tried to give ourselves rules that at least resemble |
7 |
it? |
8 |
|
9 |
If I wanted to find out expert opinions and act on that, I'd directly ask a |
10 |
couple of people on IRC that I consider knowledgeable, and then directly |
11 |
follow their advice. No mailing list need be involved. This would be |
12 |
effective, most likely technologically correct, and fast. It would also cause |
13 |
major $hitstorms, since every developer knows best about a lot of things, and |
14 |
since a lot of people would understandably feel bypassed. I would lose commit |
15 |
privileges quite fast. |
16 |
|
17 |
On the other hand, if I want to do the ultimate "right thing" in a community |
18 |
sense, I ask on the list and let the discussion develop. I get a lot of |
19 |
opinions. Some of these I consider more, some less sensible; some of these are |
20 |
better, some less well informed. On most issues, even well-informed people |
21 |
will have different opinions - sometimes things are just a matter of personal |
22 |
taste. Getting a real unanimous vote is impossible. I wait for everyone to |
23 |
read his mail; we've already heard that 72h is by far not enough time. (Half a |
24 |
year?) In the meantime the discussion has branched into a couple of topics, |
25 |
and most people have forgotten the original issue... Action may be taken on |
26 |
the day when debian stable has a newer glibc than gentoo (metaphorically |
27 |
speaking). |
28 |
|
29 |
We will in the end need a compromise that both gets things done and involves |
30 |
everyone that actively wants to be involved. (And yes, that means reading your |
31 |
mail!) |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
35 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
36 |
dilfridge@g.o |
37 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |