| 1 |
On 2022-12-26 10:11:18, Hans de Graaff wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> It would be great if you could dust these off and post them here so we |
| 4 |
> can get these improvements merged. You mention in the bug that you'd |
| 5 |
> rather wait for a dedicated maintainer to review them, but I'm (in |
| 6 |
> name) that maintainer and I think you probably know these eclasses |
| 7 |
> better than I do. With some joint effort we may get things moving here. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I'm trying to avoid becoming the de facto maintainer of the thirty or |
| 10 |
so apache modules that I care nothing about. The eclasses I posted to |
| 11 |
the bug are a proof-of-concept for www-apache/mpm_itk, but even that |
| 12 |
has a workaround allowing it to use EAPI=7 now. I haven't tested them |
| 13 |
with any other packages. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Updating apache-module-r1.eclass to EAPI=8 still requires some work, |
| 16 |
and then the whole thing needs to be tested by migrating a |
| 17 |
representative chunk of apache-module packages to determine if the |
| 18 |
idea is feasible as-is, or if the approach needs to be tweaked. Until |
| 19 |
then we'd just be wasting reviewers' time. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I may eventually get bored enough to do all that testing, but right |
| 22 |
now I have a lot of things that are actually enjoyable and/or make me |
| 23 |
money in front of it on my list. |
Archives