1 |
On 1/9/08, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:49:40 +0100 |
3 |
> "Wulf C. Krueger" <philantrop@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > >> What's the proper fix for when keyword requests stagnate in |
5 |
> > >> bugzilla? |
6 |
> > > That depends upon whether the keyword request is important. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Let's take a real world example: KDE 3.5.5 is old, buggy and has |
9 |
> > some important issues which won't be fixed anymore. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Yet it's the most proven version on mips. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> > > If it is (and legitimately so |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > I hope you'll accept it when I say that 3.5.5 is such a legitimate |
16 |
> > case now. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Why? It was good enough to be keyworded stable at one point. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> > What would you suggest to do now? I think we've done all we could |
21 |
> > short of the following: |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > a) Drop all keywords but those of mips. Leaves mips and, more |
24 |
> > importantly, its users with a vulnerable and unmaintained set of |
25 |
> > packages. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> ...and break the tree spectacularly, causing huge amounts of pain for |
28 |
> your fellow developers when they encounter horrible repoman output when |
29 |
> they try to do anything. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> > b) package.mask 3.5.5 with a big, fat warning and let the users |
32 |
> > decide. Same drawbacks as a). |
33 |
> |
34 |
> ...and break the tree spectacularly, causing huge amounts of pain for |
35 |
> your fellow developers when they encounter horrible repoman output when |
36 |
> they try to do anything. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> > c) Drop 3.5.5 from the tree. The cleanest but most radical solution. |
39 |
> > If mips' users want KDE, they would have to bug (sic!) the mips team. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> ...and break the tree spectacularly, causing huge amounts of pain for |
42 |
> your fellow developers when they encounter horrible repoman output when |
43 |
> they try to do anything. |
44 |
|
45 |
Actually if they dump kde-3.5.5 and anything depending on it, then |
46 |
they don't break the tree and everyone is happy, no? |
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |