1 |
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:08:10 +0200 |
2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:24:12 +0200 |
5 |
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > hasufell schrieb: |
8 |
> > > When I sum that up again... |
9 |
> > > - we are on gentoo and need as much information as possible for |
10 |
> > > backtracing, resolving bugs, checking whether CFLAGS and such have |
11 |
> > > been respected |
12 |
> > > - no need to tell the user to recompile with |
13 |
> > > EXTRA_ECONF="--disable-silent-rules" or similar just to be able to |
14 |
> > > help him |
15 |
> > > - some QA checks might depend on verbose build log and are not yet |
16 |
> > > implemented therefor |
17 |
> > > - if people want nice build _output_ (not log), they can use |
18 |
> > > --quiet-build |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Sorry that I am late to the party, but I would add some concerns to |
21 |
> > this discussion. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > Verbose build logs are can be several times as large as non-verbose |
24 |
> > ones, which can run into our Bugzilla's attachment size limit. When |
25 |
> > a user is unable to attach the build.log file, typically one of the |
26 |
> > following happens: |
27 |
> |
28 |
> About that -- maybe we should finally consider increasing it? |
29 |
> Nowadays, HTTP is able to handle transparent compression, so plain |
30 |
> text logs are pretty fine there. |
31 |
|
32 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430160 |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Best regards, |
36 |
Michał Górny |