Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Bryan Østergaard" <kloeri@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:34:11
Message-Id: 20070220123120.GQ10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs by Francesco Riosa
1 On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:00:12PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
2 > Bryan Østergaard ha scritto:
3 > >On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:46:32AM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
4 > ><Snipped silly inflamatory bit>
5 > >>Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
6 > >>>It is widely perceived that Gentoo has a huge problem with slacker
7 > >>>archs cluttering up the tree and making maintainers' work harder.
8 > >>>Clearly, something needs to be done about this.
9 > >>It's even more perceived that there are a couple of satellite people who
10 > >>are working very strongly and sometimes (sadly) successfully to create
11 > >>an un-healty environment for developers and users. Personally I would
12 > >>mention you Caranm, beu and geoman.
13 > >Please stop the personal attacks. They serve absolutely no purpose other
14 > >than poisoning the developer community further.
15 > >
16 > >Regards,
17 > >Bryan Østergaard
18 >
19 > mkay, but sometimes is _really_ difficult, missing flameeyes and keep
20 > geoman does not make it easyer.
21 Might be dificult but maybe you could explain how it helps to bash
22 geoman? A good advice before sending any mail like that is to take at
23 least 10 minutes break to cool off and then read it again before sending it.
24
25 Regards,
26 Bryan Østergaard
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs Francesco Riosa <vivo@g.o>