Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Francesco Riosa <vivo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:15:51
Message-Id: 45DAE2CC.8000207@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs by "Bryan Østergaard"
1 Bryan Østergaard ha scritto:
2 > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:46:32AM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
3 > <Snipped silly inflamatory bit>
4 >> Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
5 >>> It is widely perceived that Gentoo has a huge problem with slacker
6 >>> archs cluttering up the tree and making maintainers' work harder.
7 >>> Clearly, something needs to be done about this.
8 >> It's even more perceived that there are a couple of satellite people who
9 >> are working very strongly and sometimes (sadly) successfully to create
10 >> an un-healty environment for developers and users. Personally I would
11 >> mention you Caranm, beu and geoman.
12 > Please stop the personal attacks. They serve absolutely no purpose other
13 > than poisoning the developer community further.
14 >
15 > Regards,
16 > Bryan Østergaard
17
18 mkay, but sometimes is _really_ difficult, missing flameeyes and keep
19 geoman does not make it easyer.
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Slacker archs "Bryan Østergaard" <kloeri@g.o>