| 1 |
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I see a lot of packages installing /etc/modprobe.d when it should be treated |
| 3 |
> like /etc/udev, so only generated files and users own files |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On a related note, I just noticed that /etc/udev is loaded with |
| 6 |
orphans in my case, and I can't imagine I'm the only one. When we |
| 7 |
make moves like this we should include either news items or elogs or |
| 8 |
something to tell users to clean out the cruft, otherwise config |
| 9 |
protection tends to leave it there, and then users fail to get updates |
| 10 |
since their cruft overrides them. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I assume that files that aren't user-edited can just be safely deleted? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Rich |
Archives