| 1 |
Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:06:07 -0700 |
| 3 |
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> <list of trivial changes> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> There's a couple more that I wouldn't mind seeing as things developers |
| 8 |
>> can do without the maintainer, but I can see how these might be a bit |
| 9 |
>> more controversial, so I'm asking for input. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Another good candidate is correcting errors in anything dodoc is tasked |
| 12 |
> to install. When a TODO or other metafile goes missing in the course of |
| 13 |
> development, I often find ebuilds that still mention them. When I |
| 14 |
> haven't done my arch commit yet, I often correct the error after I |
| 15 |
> check whether the file has simply been moved, by either correcting the |
| 16 |
> path or removing the filename from the dodoc call. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
dodoc calls should have || die and USE=doc should be tested before |
| 19 |
commiting a bump, IMHO |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Vlastimil Babka (Caster) |
| 23 |
Gentoo/Java |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives