1 |
On Sun, 6 May 2007 15:19:53 -0400 |
2 |
Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Sunday 06 May 2007 3:02:38 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:53:22 -0400 |
5 |
> > Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> > > > One of the reasons GLEP 42 was necessary was because users |
7 |
> > > > *don't* read things delivered by other methods. |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > And they are magically going to read the news? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Experience being two news items about one package. Expand this to a |
12 |
> tree size, where the user has around 400-500 packages. If they get |
13 |
> news about changes that will increase their experience for each one |
14 |
> of these, they are looking at reading the New York Times of gentoo |
15 |
> every day. It's not going to happen. |
16 |
|
17 |
And, if that happens (which it won't), we'll have more experience and |
18 |
we can evaluate future news items based upon that. A more realistic |
19 |
view for your typical user is less than a news item per week. |
20 |
|
21 |
> > Paludis users do not consider that news item trivial. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> If I was a paludis user I would considder this trivial. The same |
24 |
> information is availible a) from the package itself. b) from the |
25 |
> changelog, and c) it still works without the change! |
26 |
|
27 |
But you aren't, and those who are disagree. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Ciaran McCreesh |