| 1 |
Am Samstag 05 Mai 2007 22:44 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:37:37 +0200 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Erm, not really? This is about proper usage of GLEP42 stuff. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Yes, it is about proper usage of GLEP 42. This news item is one example |
| 8 |
> of that. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > There's nothing critical about your * stuff. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Sure there is. If users aren't informed about the change in an |
| 13 |
> appropriate manner, the users get annoyed. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> You're trying to sabotage this based upon arguments over wording |
| 16 |
> technicalities. Where is your evidence that this is not delivering |
| 17 |
> what is best for affected users? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
A may be his evidence, as I am a user, and do not thing it is worth a news |
| 20 |
item. |
| 21 |
It wont block paludis from working and |
| 22 |
if you change it, so that it does you |
| 23 |
have caused the problem yourself because |
| 24 |
config file changes should not be abrupt, but |
| 25 |
it is good to have a "buffer" version which |
| 26 |
sends warnings to the user if |
| 27 |
he didnt fix his config. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I bet there are other users around, who think a config file format change that |
| 30 |
doesnt break anything but produce warnings in the first place is |
| 31 |
non-critical. |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives