Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 20:49:33
Message-Id: 20070505214435.2358b2ed@snowflake
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 by Jakub Moc
1 On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:37:37 +0200
2 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
3 > Erm, not really? This is about proper usage of GLEP42 stuff.
4
5 Yes, it is about proper usage of GLEP 42. This news item is one example
6 of that.
7
8 > There's nothing critical about your * stuff.
9
10 Sure there is. If users aren't informed about the change in an
11 appropriate manner, the users get annoyed.
12
13 You're trying to sabotage this based upon arguments over wording
14 technicalities. Where is your evidence that this is not delivering
15 what is best for affected users?
16
17 --
18 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 expose@×××××××××××.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 expose@×××××××××××.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Maurice van der Pot <griffon26@g.o>