| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): |
| 2 |
>> There's nothing critical about your * stuff. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Sure there is. If users aren't informed about the change in an |
| 5 |
> appropriate manner, the users get annoyed. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> You're trying to sabotage this based upon arguments over wording |
| 8 |
> technicalities. Where is your evidence that this is not delivering |
| 9 |
> what is best for affected users? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm not trying to sabotage anything but total misuse of the feature. |
| 12 |
Would have the same objections wrt whatever other "critical" news that'd |
| 13 |
constitute completely inappropriate usage of GLEP42 features. (And I'd |
| 14 |
expect that you'd show a bit more knowledge of the GLEP you are a |
| 15 |
co-author of, frankly.) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The relevant paludis output has been pasted twice already, so let me try |
| 18 |
one last time: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
<snip> |
| 21 |
... Use of token '*' is deprecated, use '*/*' instead |
| 22 |
</snip> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
How much more explanation about this 'critical' change do the users |
| 25 |
*need*? If they don't get the above, maybe paludis and Linux just isn't |
| 26 |
for them and they should stick to Windows. Meanwhile there's no need to |
| 27 |
establish a precedent of using critical news for PEBKAC issues. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Best regards, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Jakub Moc |
| 34 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 35 |
GPG signature: |
| 36 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 37 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives