| 1 |
On 11/01/2014 03:36 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:52:57PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> Michał Górny told me on IRC that I might be approaching this incorrectly (or |
| 4 |
>>> at least, inefficiently). I was working on the massive bug-spree (right now |
| 5 |
>>> stopped around 22% of the packages to investigate) so I'm temporarily |
| 6 |
>>> holding off until I'm certain. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> The only change I want to instill on packages is to remove the USE="selinux" |
| 9 |
>>> specific dependency to a sec-policy/selinux-* package from the DEPEND |
| 10 |
>>> variable. So something like: |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> DEPEND=" |
| 13 |
>>> foo |
| 14 |
>>> - bar |
| 15 |
>>> - selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-bez )" |
| 16 |
>>> + bar" |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> If I am allowed to do this change without revbumping, I can just stop making |
| 19 |
>>> massive bug reports and do the change(s) myself... |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> You should have emphasized that the dependency will still be |
| 22 |
>> in RDEPEND. As I said with QA hat on, such a change is fine since it |
| 23 |
>> affects build-time dependencies only. People who installed the package |
| 24 |
>> already are not affected. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Thanks. I'll do the necessary updates tomorrow then (without revbump) and invalidate |
| 27 |
> the bug reports I already made. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
<hat=QA> |
| 30 |
Just since you poked me on irc and I tend to yell at anyone who breaks |
| 31 |
to dep tree by making RDEPEND changes without revbump.... |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I agree with mgorny. I don't believe this change will cause any issues |
| 34 |
with the dep tree for people who aren't, or cannot, run dynamic deps. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Please proceed to make your changes as desired, without revbump, and you |
| 37 |
may close your bugs. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Thanks, |
| 40 |
Zero</hat> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Wkr, |
| 43 |
> Sven Vermeulen |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> |
Archives