| 1 |
On Friday 09 January 2004 17:23, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 2 |
> Most of this list is composed of only one or two packages per language, so |
| 3 |
> creating specific lang herd for every of them is kind of strange. Also they |
| 4 |
> seem to have been committed by different people, so organizing them |
| 5 |
> per-developer is also questionable. As I am identifying languages having |
| 6 |
> "crytical mass" of submissions and finding interested people, I spin off |
| 7 |
> another herd (like I just proposed for prolog). However this process is not |
| 8 |
> that quick either. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> What I propose is to form a single herd that should pick up majority of |
| 11 |
> these packages (and potentially related stuff from dev-utils or dev-libs). |
| 12 |
> We can call it, say, "lang-other" or "lang-unfiled" or give me a better |
| 13 |
> name ;) and start adding so far uncategorized languages to it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
seems like a neat idea ... but i know i personally dont like maintaining |
| 16 |
languages other than ones i enjoy ;) |
| 17 |
thanks for reminding me ... i put metadata.xml's in for the m3 compilers ;) |
| 18 |
-mike |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives