| 1 |
Jurek Bartuszek wrote: |
| 2 |
>> Only a short response, as I'm a bit in a hurry right now. From |
| 3 |
>> #gentoo-council earlier: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> 18:25 <@robbat2> make him covert it to "_rc%04d%04d%02d%02d",$RC,$YEAR, |
| 6 |
>> $MONTH,$DAY |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Let me see if I have this straight: suppose we have package foo-0.1_rc2 |
| 10 |
> released (very outdated) and we're waiting for foo-0.1_rc3. Then example |
| 11 |
> of something between those two would be foo-0.1_rc000220070313? Would |
| 12 |
> that force portage to update to this version? Wouldn't that prevent |
| 13 |
> portage from enforcing update to _rc3 when it's delivered? Of course I |
| 14 |
> might be wrong and if this is the case then excuse me for the whole fuss ;) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Best regards, |
| 17 |
> Jurek |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
This was one of the very valid use cases proposed and is definitely a |
| 20 |
situation where robbat2's suggestion will not work. |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives